linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/10] Core checkpoint/restart support code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:16:50 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] Core checkpoint/restart support code

On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:55:11 PDT, Matt Helsley said:

> Now we're back with a new minimal patch set. You're asking us to do the same
> thing and expect different results -- stack more patches on top and expect to
> get it reviewed. OK, but what reason do we have to believe this time will be
> any different?

Has the terrain changed any since last time? In particular, ISTR a bunch of
activity in namespace support since last time - does that change what your
patch set needs to do?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped