lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:05:28 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com> To: Natarajan Gurumoorthy <natg@...gle.com> CC: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>, "lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make all it87 drivers SMP safe. On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:03:35PM -0400, Natarajan Gurumoorthy wrote: > Guenter, > This patch patch applies a common fix to all IT87 driver. Separating it > into 2 patches (one for drivers/hwmon and one for drivers/watchdog) does not > seem to be the right thing to do. I think having all the patches in one file > makes it easier to understand the rationale behind the patch. The > it87_io_lock.c and it87_io_lock.h files are in drivers/watchdog directory and > the lock defined in it is needed by the changes in drivers/hwmon/it87.c > I dislike the idea of a single patch crossing multiple subsystems. Maybe you'll find another maintainer accepting your change as a single patch, but I won't. That doesn't mean that the patches would have to be committed into multiple trees. That is for the subsystem maintainers to sort out, and a different issue. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists