linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] bcmai: introduce AI driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 02:54:33 +0200
From:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:	George Kashperko <george@...u.edu.ua>
Cc:	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
	"b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org" <b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linuxdriverproject <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] bcmai: introduce AI driver

W dniu 7 kwietnia 2011 02:00 użytkownik George Kashperko
<george@...u.edu.ua> napisał:
> For PCI function description take a look at PCI specs or PCI
> configuration space description (e. g.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_configuration_space)
>
> Sorry for missleading short-ups, w11 - bcm80211 core, under two-head I
> mean ssb/axi with two functional cores on same interconnect (like w11
> +w11, not a lot of these exists I guess). Also there were some b43+b44
> on single PCI ssb host and those where implemented as ssb interconnect
> on multifunctional PCI host therefore providing separate access windows
> for each function.
>
> Might I mussunderstood something (its late night here at my place) when
> you where talking about using coreswitching involved for two drivers
> therefore I remembered about those functions. Seems now you were talking
> about chipcommon+b43 access sharing same window.
>
> As for core switching requirments for earlier SSB interconnects on PCI
> hosts where there were no direct chipcommon access, that one can be
> accomplished without spin_lock/mutex for b43 or b44 cores with proper
> bus design.
>
> AXI doesn't need spinlocks/mutexes as both chipcommon and pci bridge are
> available directly and b43 will be the only one requiring window access.

Ahh, so while talking about 4 windows, I guess you counted fixes
windows as well. That would be right, matching my knowledge.

When asking question about amount of cores we may want to use
simultaneously I didn't think about ChipCommon or PCIe. The real
problem would be to support for example two 802.11 cores and one
ethernet core at the same time. That gives us 3 cores while we have
only 2 sliding windows. But I would not care for that too much for
now.

For the rest (PCI function) I have to sleep before reading specs ;)

-- 
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/