linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8.75 0/4] cgroups: implement moving a threadgroup's threads atomically with cgroup.procs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:59:11 -0400
From:	Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	lizf@...fujitsu.com, matthltc@...ibm.com, menage@...gle.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8.75 0/4] cgroups: implement moving a threadgroup's
 threads atomically with cgroup.procs

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 04:25:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:44:20 -0400
> Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Same as before; using flex_array in attach_proc (thanks Kame).
> > 
> > -- Ben
> > 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt |   39 ++-
> >  block/blk-cgroup.c                |   18 -
> >  include/linux/cgroup.h            |   10 
> >  include/linux/init_task.h         |    9 
> >  include/linux/sched.h             |   36 ++
> >  kernel/cgroup.c                   |  489 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  kernel/cgroup_freezer.c           |   26 --
> >  kernel/cpuset.c                   |   96 +++----
> >  kernel/fork.c                     |   10 
> >  kernel/sched.c                    |   38 --
> >  mm/memcontrol.c                   |   18 -
> >  security/device_cgroup.c          |    3 
> >  12 files changed, 594 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
> 
> So where are we up to with all this.

done and good to go, hopefully? :O

> 
> I'm surprised that none of the patches had anyone's Acked-by: or
> Reviewed-by:.  Were they really that mean to you, or have you not been
> tracking these?
> 
> 

Oh, eep. I didn't think to put them there myself; I guess I was assuming
they'd either be implicit or that my reviewers would have something more
to say.

Thanks!

-- Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/