linux-kernel - Re: Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:47:26 +0300
From:	Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@....ntua.gr>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S)

On 04/14/2011 01:33 PM, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
> 1)I cannot understand why the WEAK entries are required after the
> bad_subarch label :/ Any hints
ok, the first question is just stupid, sorry for that one... :x

-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@....ntua.gr>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/