lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:04:40 -0400
From:	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"dzickus@...hat.com" <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	"mstowe@...hat.com" <mstowe@...hat.com>,
	"dnelson@...hat.com" <dnelson@...hat.com>,
	"rja@...ricas.sgi.com" <rja@...ricas.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3] x86, MCE: Drop the default decoding notifier



On 04/14/2011 03:02 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:49:08AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>   
>>> And we don't want to fix that - we want to fix the case with the
>>> occasional CE MCEs which get detected in the polling path but none of
>>> their MCA regs get dumped for decoding so the decoding hint there is
>>> out of place. And we fixed that at least partially so that it doesn't
>>> flood the logs. If you're not fine with the default ratelimit of 10 msgs
>>> per 5 seconds we can always raise the ratelimit but tweaking an almost
>>> hypothetical case is just not worth it.
>>>
>>>       
>> Okay -- I'm good then.
>>     
> Ok, injecting MCEs with this patch looks like this. Nevermind the
> decoded MCEs, I simply uncommented the "if (ret != NOTIFY_DONE)" line
> so that I can see the rate limiting. So we still have them there, this
> is the default setting of 10 calls per 5 secs, we might want to dial it
> down in the output. After the 10th MCE, it doesn't appear anymore.
>
> Hmm...
>
> Prarit, you said you have a machine which spits a lot of CECCs on boot,
> does the final version help there, did you have a chance to run it?
>   

Yup -- it looked good and did what I expected it to do ... I didn't save
the output though :(

P.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ