linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep: Support recurise-read locks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:45:05 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep: Support recurise-read locks

This series is a rebase of an earlier series by Gautham.

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/11/203

I left out the second patch:

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/11/205

Because I couldn't reconstruct the thinking there, nor could I find
a good reason for it. Furthermore, I added a patch at the start that
implements a few extra locking self-tests.

This series wants testing and the self-tests really want to be extended
to cover more of the recursive read lock to gain confidence that all
does indeed work as intended.

I've also rewritten most of the changelogs to (hopefully) be better.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/