linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: consider shared/unblocked signals only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:19:51 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@...sta.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: consider
 shared/unblocked signals only

Hello,

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:20:40PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Hmm... @set?  Maybe a name which refelcts its purpose, say @target or
> > @consider would be better?  Also, it would be really great to have
> > docbook function comment describing the parameter.
> 
> OK... May be @which ? but I agree with any naming.

Yeah, @which sounds fine to me.

> This series is already in -mm, I'd like to avoid another resend. So I'll
> send another patch which addresses your comments on top of this series.
> 
> OK?

Why not route through the signal/ptrace tree?  Also, is the tree
included in linux-next now?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/