lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:49:15 +0800
From:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC]block: add flush request at head

On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:21 +0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Shaohua.
> 
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 09:01:59AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > this is a regression from 2.6.39-rc2 compared to 2.6.39-rc1, so this
> > isn't related to the flush rewritten. Workload is sysbench fileio,
> > please see the first mail at the thread for detail.
> 
> Understood.  Let's talk on the other thread.
This issue isn't related to the optimization patch in another thread.
And that patch can't recover the regression, which does improve
throughput even without the regression. So please look at issue again.

Thanks,
Shaohua


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists