lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:13:12 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegardno@....uio.no>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf and kmemcheck : fatal combination

On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 14:33 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 14:27 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Thats far from trivial, maybe because we dont have NOTRACK api for
> > percpu allocations ? 
> 
> We can't use per-cpu allocations from NMI context because of the same
> problem, per-cpu uses vmalloc and vmalloc needs faults. Hence that
> shouldn't be a problem.
> 
> It looks like you covered most of it though, the buffer and the
> callchain stuff, aside from that it should only use some static data.
> 
> Pekka, what does kmemcheck do for .data and .bss things?

No, kmemcheck is only active for memory allocated with slab and the page
allocator .

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ