lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
cc:	bookjovi@...il.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: put check_mem_permission before __get_free_page
 in mem_read

On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> From 74f827ce74e1c4f846905e940edfa5f639b5a2ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:57:02 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] proc: put check_mem_permission after __get_free_page in mem_write
> 
> It should be better if put check_mem_permission after __get_free_page
> in mem_write, to be same as function mem_read.
> 
> Hugh Dickins explained the reason.
> 
>     check_mem_permission gets a reference to the mm.  If we __get_free_page
>     after check_mem_permission, imagine what happens if the system is out
>     of memory, and the mm we're looking at is selected for killing by the
>     OOM killer: while we wait in __get_free_page for more memory, no memory
>     is freed from the selected mm because it cannot reach exit_mmap while
>     we hold that reference.
> 
> 
> Reported-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Cc: Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>

Thank you, yes!

Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>

> ---
>  fs/proc/base.c |   16 +++++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 4deef2e..e93be6e 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -894,20 +894,20 @@ static ssize_t mem_write(struct file * file, const char __user *buf,
>  	if (!task)
>  		goto out_no_task;
>  
> +	copied = -ENOMEM;
> +	page = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_TEMPORARY);
> +	if (!page)
> +		goto out_task;
> +
>  	mm = check_mem_permission(task);
>  	copied = PTR_ERR(mm);
>  	if (IS_ERR(mm))
> -		goto out_task;
> +		goto out_free;
>  
>  	copied = -EIO;
>  	if (file->private_data != (void *)((long)current->self_exec_id))
>  		goto out_mm;
>  
> -	copied = -ENOMEM;
> -	page = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_TEMPORARY);
> -	if (!page)
> -		goto out_mm;
> -
>  	copied = 0;
>  	while (count > 0) {
>  		int this_len, retval;
> @@ -929,9 +929,11 @@ static ssize_t mem_write(struct file * file, const char __user *buf,
>  		count -= retval;			
>  	}
>  	*ppos = dst;
> -	free_page((unsigned long) page);
> +
>  out_mm:
>  	mmput(mm);
> +out_free:
> +	free_page((unsigned long) page);
>  out_task:
>  	put_task_struct(task);
>  out_no_task:
> -- 
> 1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ