lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:09:31 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>, "kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>, "minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>, "mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fix get_scan_count for working well with small targets On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:50:31 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:59:34 -0700 > Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > What about simply removing the nr_saved_scan logic and permitting small > > scans? That simplifies the code and I bet it makes no measurable > > performance difference. > > > > ok, v2 here. How this looks ? > For memcg, I think I should add select_victim_node() for direct reclaim, > then, we'll be tune big memcg using small memory on a zone case. > Ah, sorry this v2 doesn't remove nr_saved_scan in reclaim_stat. ... I will send v3. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists