linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/10] mach-u300: rewrite gpio driver, move to drivers/gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:10:36 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Jonas Aaberg <jonas.aberg@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mach-u300: rewrite gpio driver, move to drivers/gpio

2011/4/28 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
> 2011/4/27 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>:
>> # NOTE: platform-specific GPIO drivers don't belong in the
>> # drivers/gpio directory; put them with other platform setup
>> # code, IRQ controllers, board init, etc.
>
> Yeah, you're right. I can take these comments out, simply.
> I'll review the files as bit to make sure there aren't any more
> statements like that.

Thinking of this, the pl061.c driver is already no expansion
chip (it's SoC silicon) so this statement has been wrong for
some time already.

Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/