linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 5/8] compaction: remove active list counting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:19:44 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/8] compaction: remove active list counting

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:25:22AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> acct_isolated of compaction uses page_lru_base_type which returns only
>> base type of LRU list so it never returns LRU_ACTIVE_ANON or LRU_ACTIVE_FILE.
>> So it's pointless to add lru[LRU_ACTIVE_[ANON|FILE]] to get sum.
>>
>> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/compaction.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>> index 9f80b5a..653b02b 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ static void acct_isolated(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc)
>>               count[lru]++;
>>       }
>>
>> -     cc->nr_anon = count[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] + count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON];
>> -     cc->nr_file = count[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] + count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE];
>> +     cc->nr_anon = count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON];
>> +     cc->nr_file = count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE];
>>       __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON, cc->nr_anon);
>>       __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, cc->nr_file);
>>  }
>
> I don't see anything using cc->nr_anon and cc->nr_file outside this
> code.  Would it make sense to remove them completely?
>

Good idea.
I will remove it totally in next version.
Thanks, Hannes.


-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/