[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 01:06:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Change trap definitions to enumerated values
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Vaibhav Nagarnaik wrote:
> Steven
>
> This patch has the formatting as you suggested. Does this work for you?
>
> Thomas
>
> Can you please take a look at the patches and provide your comments?
Can you please stop that nonsense ?
You posted the patch on Tuesday, sent a reminder on Wednesday and
another one on Thursday.
Do you really think that I'm a robot waiting for your patches to
magically surface on LKML and then dropping any other activity to take
care of them ?
I have seen that patch and it's in my list to take care of, just not a
top priority level issue. It's neither a bug fix nor anything which
radically improves the kernel. So what?
I don't mind a polite reminder after a week or two in case I actually
missed a patch, but that daily reminder is just a PITA.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists