[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 08:50:31 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: Add locking to xtime access in get_seconds()
Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 23:21 -0700, john stultz a écrit :
> Would a comment to the effect of "ensure processors don't re-order calls
> to get_seconds" help, or is it still too opaque (or even still
> nonsense?).
>
Where is corresponding smp_wmb() ? It's not obvious, so you must add a
comment to help reader of this code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists