linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: sm7xx: Use kernel framebuffer mode setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 07 May 2011 03:16:46 +0200
From:	Javier Muñoz <jmunhoz@...lia.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm7xx: Use kernel framebuffer mode setting

On 05/07/2011 01:55 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:26:49AM +0200, Javier Muñoz wrote:
>> On 05/06/2011 11:22 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Javier M. Mellid wrote:
>>>> This patch implements dynamic framebuffer mode setting.
[...]
>>>
>>> This applies with fuzz, this leads me to believe that you didn't test
>>> this on the latest linux-next tree, right?
>>>
>>> What did you make this patch against?
>>
>> Sorry, I didn't know. I made this patch against
>> linux-2.6 (bfd412db9e7b0d8f7b9c09d12d07aa2ac785f1d0) as I did with
>> previous patches.
>>
>> Testing was about creating, applying, compiling and running patch
>> with kernel built from linux-2.6
>>
>> Do you need a new patch against linux-next's master? I can redo this patch.
>
> Yes, please always make patches against linux-next as it includes any
> other pending patches that are in my tree.

OK, just resending a new patch made against linux-next. Please, let me 
know if it applies seamless.

Thanks!

javi

View attachment "0001-staging-sm7xx-Use-kernel-framebuffer-mode-setting.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (5922 bytes)