| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 02:18:26 +0800 From: microcai <microcaicai@...il.com> To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [Question] Where is the missing 384k? Please, I've searching for it years! It's being too long since I got this question. I have to ask, even with a chance that I am considered as spam, and be banned by kernel.org, I have to ask. Please CC me if any one is going to answer my questions, I'll be appreciate if you solve my haze. So, my question is really simple, where is the missing 384k RAM? When I read the books about PC, or see the output of dmesg, I've always told that, 640k-1M is reserved for BIOS, and should not be used. 1) 384k RAM is reserved because BIOS is there. But I've heard that BIOS is really in a ROM, not in RAM. So, where is the RAM when CPU is addressing the ROM? Does the ROM just override the RAM and makes the RAM completely un-addressable? What if people just got 2MB RAM? 384k of 2MB RAM is a lot of wast! 2) Is there a way to unmap the ROM and get back the RAM? or remap the 384k RAM to upper address? If there is , why don't the kernel use this and get my RAM(which is money) back? 3) If there is not way to unmap the ROM or remap the RAM, why do they wast 384k RAM there! Even if 4G RAM is common now, 2M RAM is common in the old days. Why did they do that! Please help me to erase the big big question mark in my hart, Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists