linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers: create a pinmux subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 May 2011 08:46:44 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Martin Persson <martin.persson@...ricsson.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers: create a pinmux subsystem

* Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...il.com> [110507 12:07]:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> > * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com> [110502 12:13]:
> >
> > Good to see this, looks like this should work for omaps too.
> >
> > The numbering solves the issue where we have multiple
> > pinmux domains (base + offset for each domain).
> >
> > Then I would assume that for most cases the pin access can be
> > described with:
> >
> > unsigned long pinmux_base;      /* Can have multiple pinux domains */
> > u16 pinmux_reg_offset;          /* Register offset from pinmux_base */
> > u16 flags;                      /* Register width etc */
> >
> > Which can be accessed with read[bwl] and write[bwl], so we
> > can have default access functions in the pinux framework and
> > don't necessarily have to implement them for each platform.
> 
> On some platforms setting the pin configuration won't require to keep
> that lot of data, see, e.g. Orion and it's successors.

Yeah but if we can figure out some common data format the wasted
memory won't matter compared to having common code.

I guess if we plan on passing the mux registers in devicetree data,
we actually should just have something like this for each mux entry: 

address
muxmodes
flags

Don't know how well that would work for tegra, can you calculate
the configuration registers from some base address maybe?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/