linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinmux: add a driver for the U300 pinmux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 May 2011 17:28:51 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Martin Persson <martin.persson@...ricsson.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinmux: add a driver for the U300 pinmux

On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 02:17 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/5/2 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
> > On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 21:16 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > []
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinmux/pinmux-u300.c b/drivers/pinmux/pinmux-u300.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pinmux/pinmux-u300.c
> >> +struct u300_pin_desc {
> >> +     unsigned number;
> >> +     char *name;
> > const char *name?
> Thanks, fixed!
> Can I have your reviewed-by for this patch given I fixed that?

Hi Linus.

I've only looked at the code not compiled, used or tested it
and so I think my sign-off isn't particularly valuable.

But your design and implementation seem sensible.

Anyway if you want for the whole series:

Reviewed-but-not-compiled-used-or-tested-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>

(that way I won't get copied by get_maintainer.pl ;)

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/