linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] perf: bogus correlation of kernel symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:37 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: bogus correlation of kernel symbols

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> I think there is a serious problem with kernel symbol correlation
> with the latest perf in 2.6.39-rc7-tip.

Yeah. It's annoying. It's a "perf" bug, though - triggered by
/proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict being set to 1.

The bug is that perf doesn't say "I can't match kernel symbols", but
instead does some crazy matching and gives total crap module
information (I think it just picks the one that shows up last in
/proc/kallsyms).

That said, I have considered just reverting the thing that makes
kptr_restrict be 1 by default. I do like the security implications of
restricting visibility into kernel pointers, but I also think that
security rules that make the system less usable are dubious. So I
dunno.

                           Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/