[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 14:31:52 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] bsg: remove unnecessary conditional expressions
Second condition in OR always implies first condition is false
thus bytes_read in the second is not needed. The same goes to
bytes_written.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
---
block/bsg.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
index c4f49e255751..b7e42ad55361 100644
--- a/block/bsg.c
+++ b/block/bsg.c
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ bsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
ret = __bsg_read(buf, count, bd, NULL, &bytes_read);
*ppos = bytes_read;
- if (!bytes_read || (bytes_read && err_block_err(ret)))
+ if (!bytes_read || err_block_err(ret))
bytes_read = ret;
return bytes_read;
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ bsg_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
/*
* return bytes written on non-fatal errors
*/
- if (!bytes_written || (bytes_written && err_block_err(ret)))
+ if (!bytes_written || err_block_err(ret))
bytes_written = ret;
dprintk("%s: returning %Zd\n", bd->name, bytes_written);
--
1.7.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists