linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: MMU: optimize pte write path if don't have protected sp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 15 May 2011 11:38:29 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: MMU: optimize pte write path if don't have protected
 sp

On 05/15/2011 11:33 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >
> >  These atomic ops are always called from within the spinlock, so we don't need an atomic_t here.
> >
> >  Sorry, I should have noticed this on the first version.
>
> We read indirect_shadow_pages atomically on pte write path, that is allowed out of mmu_lock

Reading is fine:

   #define atomic_read(v)    (*(volatile int *)&(v)->counter)

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/