[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110519093706.GE6251@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:37:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] clockevents: Provide interface to reconfigure an
active clock event device
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > + */
> > > +int clockevents_reconfigure(struct clock_event_device *dev, u32 freq)
> >
> > This too could use a struct clockevents_params perhaps - and would only use
> > params.freq for now but might be extended in the future.
> >
> > But i'm fine with this API as well:
>
> I agree for the config_register interface, but here we really just
> want to update the frequency and not change any other parameter.
ok, fair enough - in that case i'd suggest making that property explicitly
visible in the API name, via something like:
int clockevents_set_freq(struct clock_event_device *dev, u32 freq)
That way it's obvious at first sight what this does:
clockevents_set_freq(dev, 1000000);
Versus:
clockevents_reconfigure(dev, 1000000);
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists