linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: Add simple gated clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 May 2011 13:37:03 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: Add simple gated clock

On Friday 20 May 2011 09:27:49 Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> +static int clk_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *clk)
> +{
> +       struct clk_gate *gate = to_clk_gate(clk);
> +       u32 reg;
> +
> +       reg = __raw_readl(gate->reg);
> +       reg |= 1 << gate->bit_idx;
> +       __raw_writel(reg, gate->reg);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}

__raw_readl/__raw_writel is a rather bad choice for a common driver,
it might not do what you need. Unfortunately, readl() also wouldn't
do the right thing on all architectures, because it might only
be available on PCI buses. Maybe iowrite32 would be best here?

Instead of the bit_idx, a mask value might be better to avoid
confusion with the different ways of counting bits from one or
the other end.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/