lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 20 May 2011 20:42:54 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
Cc:	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, eranian@...gle.com, adobriyan@...il.com,
	penberg@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: bogus correlation of kernel symbols


* Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com> wrote:

> At least one distro (Red Hat) ships with panic_on_oops enabled by default, so 
> attackers don't get more than one chance.  Likewise, vulnerabilities in 
> interrupt context will only have one chance, as will any issue where failed 
> exploitation prevents subsequent attempts, as is frequently the case due to 
> failures to clean up locking primitives on an OOPS.

So it's basically a last line of defense: the attacker has to assume the risk 
of the attack being detected.

That has a chilling effect on some types of attacks: especially those where the 
attacker goes against a high value target with a zero day kernel exploit. 
Risking a crash does not just mean possibly alerting the target, but also means 
possibly losing the zero-day exploit - if that oops log gets to a kernel 
developer who starts wondering about the weird backtrace.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ