lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 17:03:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org Subject: Re: Adding an ugliness in __read_cache_page()? On Sun, 22 May 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote: > > > > Would it be better to make i915 and ttm call shmem_read_cache_page() > > directly? Perhaps removing the then unused read_cache_page_gfp(), or > > perhaps not: may still be needed for i915 and ttm on tiny !SHMEM ramfs. > > I would certainly prefer the "make i915 and ttm call > shmem_read_cache_page directly" approach over putting some nasty hack > in __read_cache_page. Thank you: I'll go that way. Hugh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists