linux-kernel - Re: perf: regression -- missing /sys/devices/system/cpu/perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 May 2011 21:48:10 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: perf: regression -- missing /sys/devices/system/cpu/perf_events


* Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu> wrote:

> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > A much more reliable way is simply doing the syscall and seeing what
> > happens. But if you want to poke around in sysfs, /sys/bus/event_source/
> > is the new location.
> 
> It's been suggested that they can look for the existence of:
>   /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
> 
> is that something not likely to go away?

Well, we indeed do not remove kernel parameters, but checking for that would 
break on systems (or chroot environments) that do not have /proc mounted or 
visible.

So, what is wrong with the method Peter suggested: the presence of the perf 
syscall (it not returning -ENOSYS) is bona fide evidence that perf is 
available.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/