linux-kernel - Re: UNIX Compatibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 May 2011 13:30:28 +0200
From:	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>
To:	Michael Witten <mfwitten@...il.com>
Cc:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Richard Yao <ryao@...sunysb.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UNIX Compatibility

On Mit, 2011-05-25 at 18:51 +0000, Michael Witten wrote:
[...] 
> A user should be able to request (possibly dynamically) as many
> standards-compliant interfaces as possible from Linux (even if that
> precludes new features or optimizations).

A user can request anything anytime since ages. But if no one implements
and maintains it, s/he can't so anything anyways - except to implement
and maintain it on his/her own.

Bernd
-- 
Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at
                     LUGA : http://www.luga.at

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/