| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 10:14:46 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 10/10] memcg : reclaim statistics
On Thu, 26 May 2011 18:17:04 -0700
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com> wrote:
> Hi Kame:
>
> I applied the patch on top of mmotm-2011-05-12-15-52. After boot up, i
> keep getting the following crash by reading the
> /dev/cgroup/memory/memory.reclaim_stat
>
> [ 200.776366] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> [ 200.781591] Pid: 7535, comm: cat Tainted: G D W 2.6.39-mcg-DEV #130
> [ 200.788463] Call Trace:
> [ 200.790916] [<ffffffff81405a75>] panic+0x91/0x194
> [ 200.797096] [<ffffffff81408ac8>] oops_end+0xae/0xbe
> [ 200.803450] [<ffffffff810398d3>] die+0x5a/0x63
> [ 200.809366] [<ffffffff81408561>] do_trap+0x121/0x130
> [ 200.814427] [<ffffffff81037fe6>] do_divide_error+0x90/0x99
> [#1] SMP
> [ 200.821395] [<ffffffff81112bcb>] ? mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_read+0x28/0xf0
> [ 200.829624] [<ffffffff81104509>] ? page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x7e/0x90
> [ 200.837372] [<ffffffff810fb7f8>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x28a/0x775
> [ 200.844773] [<ffffffff8140f0f5>] divide_error+0x15/0x20
> [ 200.851471] [<ffffffff81112bcb>] ? mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_read+0x28/0xf0
> [ 200.859729] [<ffffffff810a4a01>] cgroup_seqfile_show+0x38/0x46
> [ 200.867036] [<ffffffff810a4d72>] ? cgroup_lock+0x17/0x17
> [ 200.872444] [<ffffffff81133f2c>] seq_read+0x182/0x361
> [ 200.878984] [<ffffffff8111a0c4>] vfs_read+0xab/0x107
> [ 200.885403] [<ffffffff8111a1e0>] sys_read+0x4a/0x6e
> [ 200.891764] [<ffffffff8140f469>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x27
>
> I will debug it, but like to post here in case i missed some patches in between.
>
It must be mem->scanned is 0 and
mem->reclaimed * 100 /mem->scanned cause error.
It must be mem->reclaimed * 100 / (mem->scanned +1).
I'll fix. thank you for reporting.
Thanks,
-Kame
> --Ying
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:36 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
> <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds a file memory.reclaim_stat.
> >
> > This file shows following.
> > ==
> > recent_scan_success_ratio 12 # recent reclaim/scan ratio.
> > limit_scan_pages 671 # scan caused by hitting limit.
> > limit_freed_pages 538 # freed pages by limit_scan
> > limit_elapsed_ns 518555076 # elapsed time in LRU scanning by limit.
> > soft_scan_pages 0 # scan caused by softlimit.
> > soft_freed_pages 0 # freed pages by soft_scan.
> > soft_elapsed_ns 0 # elapsed time in LRU scanning by softlimit.
> > margin_scan_pages 16744221 # scan caused by auto-keep-margin
> > margin_freed_pages 565943 # freed pages by auto-keep-margin.
> > margin_elapsed_ns 5545388791 # elapsed time in LRU scanning by auto-keep-margin
> >
> > This patch adds a new file rather than adding more stats to memory.stat. By it,
> > this support "reset" accounting by
> >
> > # echo 0 > .../memory.reclaim_stat
> >
> > This is good for debug and tuning.
> >
> > TODO:
> > - add Documentaion.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: memcg_async/mm/memcontrol.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- memcg_async.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ memcg_async/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -216,6 +216,13 @@ static void mem_cgroup_update_margin_to_
> > static void mem_cgroup_may_async_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
> > static void mem_cgroup_reflesh_scan_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
> >
> > +enum scan_type {
> > + LIMIT_SCAN, /* scan memory because memcg hits limit */
> > + SOFT_SCAN, /* scan memory because of soft limit */
> > + MARGIN_SCAN, /* scan memory for making margin to limit */
> > + NR_SCAN_TYPES,
> > +};
> > +
> > /*
> > * The memory controller data structure. The memory controller controls both
> > * page cache and RSS per cgroup. We would eventually like to provide
> > @@ -300,6 +307,13 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> > unsigned long scanned;
> > unsigned long reclaimed;
> > unsigned long next_scanratio_update;
> > + /* For statistics */
> > + struct {
> > + unsigned long nr_scanned_pages;
> > + unsigned long nr_reclaimed_pages;
> > + unsigned long elapsed_ns;
> > + } scan_stat[NR_SCAN_TYPES];
> > +
> > /*
> > * percpu counter.
> > */
> > @@ -1426,7 +1440,9 @@ unsigned int mem_cgroup_swappiness(struc
> >
> > static void __mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > unsigned long scanned,
> > - unsigned long reclaimed)
> > + unsigned long reclaimed,
> > + unsigned long elapsed,
> > + enum scan_type type)
> > {
> > unsigned long limit;
> >
> > @@ -1439,6 +1455,9 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_update_scan_rat
> > mem->scanned /= 2;
> > mem->reclaimed /= 2;
> > }
> > + mem->scan_stat[type].nr_scanned_pages += scanned;
> > + mem->scan_stat[type].nr_reclaimed_pages += reclaimed;
> > + mem->scan_stat[type].elapsed_ns += elapsed;
> > spin_unlock(&mem->scan_stat_lock);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1448,6 +1467,8 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_update_scan_rat
> > * @root : root memcg of hierarchy walk.
> > * @scanned : scanned pages
> > * @reclaimed: reclaimed pages.
> > + * @elapsed: used time for memory reclaim
> > + * @type : scan type as LIMIT_SCAN, SOFT_SCAN, MARGIN_SCAN.
> > *
> > * record scan/reclaim ratio to the memcg both to a child and it's root
> > * mem cgroup, which is a reclaim target. This value is used for
> > @@ -1457,11 +1478,14 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_update_scan_rat
> > static void mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > struct mem_cgroup *root,
> > unsigned long scanned,
> > - unsigned long reclaimed)
> > + unsigned long reclaimed,
> > + unsigned long elapsed,
> > + int type)
> > {
> > - __mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(mem, scanned, reclaimed);
> > + __mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(mem, scanned, reclaimed, elapsed, type);
> > if (mem != root)
> > - __mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(root, scanned, reclaimed);
> > + __mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(root, scanned, reclaimed,
> > + elapsed, type);
> >
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1906,6 +1930,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
> > bool is_kswapd = false;
> > unsigned long excess;
> > unsigned long nr_scanned;
> > + unsigned long start, end, elapsed;
> >
> > excess = res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&root_mem->res) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >
> > @@ -1947,18 +1972,24 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
> > }
> > /* we use swappiness of local cgroup */
> > if (check_soft) {
> > + start = sched_clock();
> > ret = mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(victim, gfp_mask,
> > noswap, zone, &nr_scanned);
> > + end = sched_clock();
> > + elapsed = end - start;
> > *total_scanned += nr_scanned;
> > mem_cgroup_soft_steal(victim, is_kswapd, ret);
> > mem_cgroup_soft_scan(victim, is_kswapd, nr_scanned);
> > mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(victim,
> > - root_mem, nr_scanned, ret);
> > + root_mem, nr_scanned, ret, elapsed, SOFT_SCAN);
> > } else {
> > + start = sched_clock();
> > ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(victim, gfp_mask,
> > noswap, &nr_scanned);
> > + end = sched_clock();
> > + elapsed = end - start;
> > mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(victim,
> > - root_mem, nr_scanned, ret);
> > + root_mem, nr_scanned, ret, elapsed, LIMIT_SCAN);
> > }
> > css_put(&victim->css);
> > /*
> > @@ -4003,7 +4034,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_async_shrink_work
> > struct delayed_work *dw = to_delayed_work(work);
> > struct mem_cgroup *mem, *victim;
> > long nr_to_reclaim;
> > - unsigned long nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed;
> > + unsigned long nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed, start, end;
> > int delay = 0;
> >
> > mem = container_of(dw, struct mem_cgroup, async_work);
> > @@ -4022,9 +4053,12 @@ static void mem_cgroup_async_shrink_work
> > if (!victim)
> > goto finish_scan;
> >
> > + start = sched_clock();
> > nr_reclaimed = mem_cgroup_shrink_rate_limited(victim, nr_to_reclaim,
> > &nr_scanned);
> > - mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(victim, mem, nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed);
> > + end = sched_clock();
> > + mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(victim, mem, nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed,
> > + end - start, MARGIN_SCAN);
> > css_put(&victim->css);
> >
> > /* If margin is enough big, stop */
> > @@ -4680,6 +4714,38 @@ static int mem_control_stat_show(struct
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> > + struct cgroup_map_cb *cb)
> > +{
> > + struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
> > + u64 val;
> > + int i; /* for indexing scan_stat[] */
> > +
> > + val = mem->reclaimed * 100 / mem->scanned;
> > + cb->fill(cb, "recent_scan_success_ratio", val);
> > + i = LIMIT_SCAN;
> > + cb->fill(cb, "limit_scan_pages", mem->scan_stat[i].nr_scanned_pages);
> > + cb->fill(cb, "limit_freed_pages", mem->scan_stat[i].nr_reclaimed_pages);
> > + cb->fill(cb, "limit_elapsed_ns", mem->scan_stat[i].elapsed_ns);
> > + i = SOFT_SCAN;
> > + cb->fill(cb, "soft_scan_pages", mem->scan_stat[i].nr_scanned_pages);
> > + cb->fill(cb, "soft_freed_pages", mem->scan_stat[i].nr_reclaimed_pages);
> > + cb->fill(cb, "soft_elapsed_ns", mem->scan_stat[i].elapsed_ns);
> > + i = MARGIN_SCAN;
> > + cb->fill(cb, "margin_scan_pages", mem->scan_stat[i].nr_scanned_pages);
> > + cb->fill(cb, "margin_freed_pages", mem->scan_stat[i].nr_reclaimed_pages);
> > + cb->fill(cb, "margin_elapsed_ns", mem->scan_stat[i].elapsed_ns);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_reset(struct cgroup *cgrp, unsigned int event)
> > +{
> > + struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
> > + memset(mem->scan_stat, 0, sizeof(mem->scan_stat));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > /*
> > * User flags for async_control is a subset of mem->async_flags. But
> > * this needs to be defined independently to hide implemation details.
> > @@ -5163,6 +5229,11 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[]
> > .open = mem_control_numa_stat_open,
> > },
> > #endif
> > + {
> > + .name = "reclaim_stat",
> > + .read_map = mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_read,
> > + .trigger = mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_reset,
> > + }
> > };
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists