linux-kernel - Re: 3.0-rc1 the file, 3.0.0-rc1 in makefile, what's correct, whats the internal designation within vmlinuz and the modules ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 May 2011 00:16:17 -0400
From:	"werner" <w.landgraf@...ru>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...otime.net
Subject: Re: 3.0-rc1 the file, 3.0.0-rc1 in makefile, what's correct,
 whats the internal designation within vmlinuz and the modules ?

The compilation failed because the modules seems to have 
the designation 3.0.0-rc1 but the install script is 
searching for /lib/modules/3.0-rc1 .  I'll repeat the 
compilation calling the .tar.bz and version 3.0.0-rc1 . I 
ask me, for what this inconsistency ...

The compilation is full with section missmatches , by 
inconsistencies in call parameters. Although this gives no 
error message, in the most cases there is any mistake, and 
possibly any side-effect on runtime.   In the past, 
although reclamations, such problems often were not 
repaired.

wl
---
Professional hosting for everyone - http://www.host.ru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/