| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:30:26 +0200 From: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@...ai.net> To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, xfs@....sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] vfs: increase shrinker batch size Just noticed below two typos. * Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com> > > Now that the per-sb shrinker is responsible for shrinking 2 or more > caches, increase the batch size to keep econmies of scale for economies (..) > Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt | 5 +++++ > fs/super.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt > index dc732d2..2e26973 100644 > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt > @@ -317,6 +317,11 @@ or bottom half). > the VM is trying to reclaim under GFP_NOFS conditions, hence this > method does not need to handle that situation itself. > > + Implementations must include conditional reschedule calls inside any > + scanning loop that is done. This allows the VFS to determine > + appropriate scan batch sizes without having to worry about whether > + implementations will cause holdoff problems due ot large batch sizes. due to Best regards, Nicolas Kaiser -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists