linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] KVM: Expose a version 1 architectural PMU to guests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:12:58 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] KVM: Expose a version 1 architectural PMU to guests

On 06/03/2011 05:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:55 -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >  +static u64 read_gp_pmc(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> >  +{
> >  +       u64 counter, enabled, running;
> >  +
> >  +       counter = pmc->counter;
> >  +
> >  +       if (pmc->perf_event)
> >  +               counter += perf_event_read_value(pmc->perf_event,
> >  +&enabled,&running);
> >  +
> >  +       /* FIXME: Scaling needed? */
>
> Yeah, either that or use attr.pinned = 1, doing the latter will result
> in an error when the PMU is overloaded though.

So what's the scale factor? enabled / running?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/