lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:39:04 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	"Jean Delvare (PC drivers, core)" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
	Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@....com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: reorganize drivers

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Sunday 05 June 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
>>  rename drivers/spi/{omap2_mcspi.c => spi_omap2_mcspi.c} (100%)
>>  rename drivers/spi/{omap_spi_100k.c => spi_omap_100k.c} (100%)
>>  rename drivers/spi/{omap_uwire.c => spi_omap_uwire.c} (100%)
>>  rename drivers/spi/{orion_spi.c => spi_orion.c} (100%)
>>  rename drivers/spi/{amba-pl022.c => spi_pl022.c} (100%)
>>  rename drivers/spi/{pxa2xx_spi.c => spi_pxa2xx.c} (100%)
>>  rename drivers/spi/{pxa2xx_spi_pci.c => spi_pxa2xx_pci.c} (100%)
>>  rename drivers/spi/{ti-ssp-spi.c => spi_ti_ssp.c} (100%)
>>  rename drivers/spi/{tle62x0.c => spi_tle62x0.c} (100%)
>>  rename drivers/spi/{xilinx_spi.c => spi_xilinx.c} (100%)
>
> I recently looked at the directory structure in drivers/ and found a lot
> of bus drivers with very few files, plus a few bus drivers with a lot
> of files in them besides directories for non-bus specific subsystems.
>
> I think it would be good to move them into a deeper directory drivers/bus/
> if we have support from the maintainers, and it's probably better if we
> only have to move the files once to reduce the amount of churn on the
> MAINTAINERS file and any out of tree patches.

I had this thought too when I was looking at reorganizing the gpio and
spi directories, but ultimately I came to the conclusion that it
didn't really make much sense to move them.  Bus drivers are just
another kind of device driver.  In general, the organization of having
a directory (like spi or i2c) containing both the common bus
infrastructure and a set of drivers using it, and this isn't even
unlike what we do for non-bus drivers.  I don't see much need to move
these.

However, there are a number of bus types that have infrastructure, but
no actual drivers associated with them, like mca, amba and clk.  It
might make sense to move those bus types into drivers/base alongside
the platform_bus_type implementation.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ