[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:08:08 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Arne Jansen <lists@...-jansens.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
efault@....de, npiggin@...nel.dk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
frank.rowand@...sony.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [debug patch] printk: Add a printk killswitch to robustify NMI
watchdog messages
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> The real fix might be to remove the lockdep_off()/on() call from
> printk(), that looks actively evil ... we had to hack through
> several layers of side-effects before we found the real bug - so
> it's not like the off()/on() made things more robust!
The other obvious fix would be to *remove* the blasted wakeup from
printk(). It's a serious debugging robustness violation and it's not
like the wakeup is super important latency-wise.
We *already* have a timer tick driven klogd wakeup poll routine. So i
doubt we'd have many problems from not doing wakeups from printk().
Opinions?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists