[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:22:29 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: David Oliver <david@...advisors.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...advisors.com>,
Zachary Vonler <zvonler@...advisors.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Change in functionality of futex() system call.
Le lundi 06 juin 2011 à 18:16 +0200, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
> Hmm, wouldn't that still be susceptible to the zero-page thing if: we
> create a writable private file map of a sparse file, touch a page and
> then remap the thing RO?
>
>
>
Also I am not sure how MAP_PRIVATE could be affected. If we still try a
RW gup()... It will allocate a page for us, instead of still pointing to
shared one.
On previous kernel, the application using read-only mapping could use
MAP_PRIVATE or MAP_SHARED with same 'behavior'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists