lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:54:24 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	pageexec@...email.hu
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@....edu>, x86@...nel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@...labs.com>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] x86-64: Add CONFIG_UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS to
 feature-removal-schedule


* pageexec@...email.hu <pageexec@...email.hu> wrote:

> On 6 Jun 2011 at 17:15, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > pageexec@...email.hu <pageexec@...email.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > my bandwidth/quota for replying to idiocy is limited (and is 
> > > close to exhaustion for today ;), be patient, i'll reply to
> > > you as well.
> > 
> > You might want to save the insults to after we are done with the 
> > discussion.
> 
> haha, Ingo, seriously, you wrote the above 20 minutes after this 
> one?
>
> > Unfortunately Andi has been spouting nonsense in this thread 
> > without replying to mails that challenge his points, such as:
> 
> tell you what Ingo, heed your own advice. better, you can even keep 
> it to yourself. i do whatever i want, including what you reserve 
> for seemingly yourself only.

The difference is that:

 - You wrote an insult without waiting for the discussion to come to
   a conclusion. I think you are wrong and i am willing to argue it.

 - Andi first tried to injected fear, uncertainty and doubt into the
   discussion a week ago, then ignored 3 mails from 3 separate people
   and thus when he repeated his nonsense today (while still ignoring
   the feedback he got) i sure can call his opinion 'nonsense'.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ