[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:41:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@....EDU>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, pageexec@...email.hu,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86-64: Clean up vsyscall emulation and remove
fixed-address ret
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@....EDU> wrote:
> Remove the fixed-address ret in the vsyscall emulation stubs. As a
> result, int 0xcc no longer works if executed from user address space
> (which is OK -- nothing sensible should do that).
>
> Removing support for int 0xcc in user address space cleans up the
> code considerably.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/vsyscall.h | 10 ++++-
> arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c | 78 +++++++++++--------------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_emu_64.S | 17 +--------
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
Ok, this makes the whole series a lot more palatable!
Can i propagate the rename suggested by hpa into patch #3:
CONFIG_COMPAT_VSYSCALL => CONFIG_LEGACY_VSYSCALL
? 'legacy' is probably the best name for this and it thus won't be
confused with the 32-bit compat facilities we have.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists