[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:08:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Arne Jansen <lists@...-jansens.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
efault@....de, npiggin@...nel.dk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
frank.rowand@...sony.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [debug patch] printk: Add a printk killswitch to robustify NMI
watchdog messages
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 20:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > - The first one that minimally removes the lockdep_off()/on() dance
> > and fixes the regression: the patch that i sent earlier today.
> > I *think* that should fix the crash.
> >
> > 3.0 material.
>
> I think the lock_is_held() fix is the urgent one, all the others are
> make printk() suck less patches, ie. not so very important.
>
> Without that lock_is_held() thing all lockdep_off() sites, inc ntfs will
> still be able to trigger this problem.
ok. Could you please send a changeloggified patch with a
Reported-and-tested-by from Arne in a new thread, etc?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists