linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make GFP_DMA allocations w/o ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
cc:	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mel@....ul.ie,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, riel@...hat.com, pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make GFP_DMA allocations w/o ZONE_DMA emit a warning
 instead of failing

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> > Should one submit a patch adding a warning to GFP_DMA allocations
> > w/o ZONE_DMA, or the idea of the original patch is wrong?
> 
> Linus was far from impressed by the original commit, saying:
> | Using GFP_DMA is reasonable in a driver - on platforms where that
> | matters, it should allocate from the DMA zone, on platforms where it
> | doesn't matter it should be a no-op.
> 
> So no, not even a warning.
> 

Any words of wisdom for users with CONFIG_ZONE_DMA=n that actually use 
drivers where they need GFP_DMA?  The page allocator should just silently 
return memory from anywhere?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/