lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:49:10 +0800
From:	Eric Miao <eric.miao@...aro.org>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio/plat-pxa: fix clash with gpiolib namespace

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Grant Likely
<grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 05:03:50PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Linus Walleij
>> <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com> wrote:
>> > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> >
>> > The PXA platform code has a static inline helper called
>> > gpio_to_chip which clashes with the gpiolib namespace if we
>> > try to expose the function with the same name from gpiolib,
>> > and it's still confusing even if we don't do that. So rename
>> > it to gpio_to_pxachip().
>> >
>> > Reported-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
>> > Cc: Eric Miao <eric.miao@...aro.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>>
>> OK, applied to 'devel'.
>
> Is the pxa gpio driver going to be moved to drivers/gpio this cycle?
> If so, you'll probably want to keep the gpio changes in a separate
> branch that can be merged both into gpio/next and your devel branch,
> just in case there ends up being merge issues between our branches in
> linux-next.

Working on that - the problem is the tight coupling of IRQ subsystem and
PXA's odd interrupt routing scheme (GPIO0, GPIO1 have dedicated IRQs,
yet GPIO2 and above they share a single GPIO), while some other PXAs
they all share a single IRQ line. Would work on that for some time
though, so yeah I'll possibly keep this in seperate branch.

>
> g.
>
>>
>> > ---
>> >  arch/arm/plat-pxa/gpio.c |   10 +++++-----
>> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-pxa/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-pxa/gpio.c
>> > index 48ebb94..a11dc36 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-pxa/gpio.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-pxa/gpio.c
>> > @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *gpio_chip_base(struct gpio_chip *c)
>> >        return container_of(c, struct pxa_gpio_chip, chip)->regbase;
>> >  }
>> >
>> > -static inline struct pxa_gpio_chip *gpio_to_chip(unsigned gpio)
>> > +static inline struct pxa_gpio_chip *gpio_to_pxachip(unsigned gpio)
>> >  {
>> >        return &pxa_gpio_chips[gpio_to_bank(gpio)];
>> >  }
>> > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static int pxa_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>> >        int gpio = irq_to_gpio(d->irq);
>> >        unsigned long gpdr, mask = GPIO_bit(gpio);
>> >
>> > -       c = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
>> > +       c = gpio_to_pxachip(gpio);
>> >
>> >        if (type == IRQ_TYPE_PROBE) {
>> >                /* Don't mess with enabled GPIOs using preconfigured edges or
>> > @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static void pxa_gpio_demux_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>> >  static void pxa_ack_muxed_gpio(struct irq_data *d)
>> >  {
>> >        int gpio = irq_to_gpio(d->irq);
>> > -       struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
>> > +       struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_pxachip(gpio);
>> >
>> >        __raw_writel(GPIO_bit(gpio), c->regbase + GEDR_OFFSET);
>> >  }
>> > @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static void pxa_ack_muxed_gpio(struct irq_data *d)
>> >  static void pxa_mask_muxed_gpio(struct irq_data *d)
>> >  {
>> >        int gpio = irq_to_gpio(d->irq);
>> > -       struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
>> > +       struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_pxachip(gpio);
>> >        uint32_t grer, gfer;
>> >
>> >        c->irq_mask &= ~GPIO_bit(gpio);
>> > @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static void pxa_mask_muxed_gpio(struct irq_data *d)
>> >  static void pxa_unmask_muxed_gpio(struct irq_data *d)
>> >  {
>> >        int gpio = irq_to_gpio(d->irq);
>> > -       struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_chip(gpio);
>> > +       struct pxa_gpio_chip *c = gpio_to_pxachip(gpio);
>> >
>> >        c->irq_mask |= GPIO_bit(gpio);
>> >        update_edge_detect(c);
>> > --
>> > 1.7.3.2
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ