linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: include linux/gpio.h where needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:59:01 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Dmitry Artamonow <mad_soft@...ox.ru>,
	x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Harald Welte <laforge@...fiish.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: include linux/gpio.h where needed

On 06/14/11 17:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:06:02 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>>
>> Some files use GPIOF_ macros but don't include the header file
>> for them.  These macros are being moved to <linux/gpio.h>, so add
>> includes for <linux/gpio.h> where needed.
> 
> Shouldn't these patches be in the other order to avoid bisection problems?

Hm, I suppose so.

Grant, can you apply these with patch 2/2 first or do I need to resend
the patches?

thanks,
-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/