linux-kernel - Re: REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching anon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:28:00 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching
 anon_vma->lock to mutex

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 20:58 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok, I'm still thinking. I have an approach that I think will handle it
> fairly cleanly, but that involves walking the same_vma list twice:
> once to actually unlink the anon_vma's under the lock, and then a
> second pass that does the rest. It should work. 

Something like so? Compiles and runs the benchmark in question.

---
Index: linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/rmap.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c
@@ -324,36 +324,52 @@ int anon_vma_fork(struct vm_area_struct
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
-static void anon_vma_unlink(struct anon_vma_chain *anon_vma_chain)
+static int anon_vma_unlink(struct anon_vma_chain *anon_vma_chain, struct anon_vma *anon_vma)
 {
-	struct anon_vma *anon_vma = anon_vma_chain->anon_vma;
-	int empty;
-
-	/* If anon_vma_fork fails, we can get an empty anon_vma_chain. */
-	if (!anon_vma)
-		return;
-
-	anon_vma_lock(anon_vma);
 	list_del(&anon_vma_chain->same_anon_vma);
 
 	/* We must garbage collect the anon_vma if it's empty */
-	empty = list_empty(&anon_vma->head);
-	anon_vma_unlock(anon_vma);
+	if (list_empty(&anon_vma->head))
+		return 1;
 
-	if (empty)
-		put_anon_vma(anon_vma);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 void unlink_anon_vmas(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
 	struct anon_vma_chain *avc, *next;
+	struct anon_vma *root = NULL;
 
 	/*
 	 * Unlink each anon_vma chained to the VMA.  This list is ordered
 	 * from newest to oldest, ensuring the root anon_vma gets freed last.
 	 */
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(avc, next, &vma->anon_vma_chain, same_vma) {
-		anon_vma_unlink(avc);
+		struct anon_vma *anon_vma = avc->anon_vma;
+
+		/* If anon_vma_fork fails, we can get an empty anon_vma_chain. */
+		if (anon_vma) {
+			root = lock_anon_vma_root(root, anon_vma);
+			/* Leave empty anon_vmas on the list. */
+			if (anon_vma_unlink(avc, anon_vma))
+				continue;
+		}
+		list_del(&avc->same_vma);
+		anon_vma_chain_free(avc);
+	}
+	unlock_anon_vma_root(root);
+
+	/*
+	 * Iterate the list once more, it now only contains empty and unlinked
+	 * anon_vmas, destroy them. Could not do before due to anon_vma_free()
+	 * needing to acquire the anon_vma->root->mutex.
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(avc, next, &vma->anon_vma_chain, same_vma) {
+		struct anon_vma *anon_vma = avc->anon_vma;
+
+		if (anon_vma)
+			put_anon_vma(anon_vma);
+
 		list_del(&avc->same_vma);
 		anon_vma_chain_free(avc);
 	}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/