| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:52:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> cc: akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > And regardless of the patch path that is taken, update test(s) if > > applicable. Thanks for the links, Randy, I hadn't thought of those at all. > > I thought that someone from Red Hat had a kernel loadable > > module for testing radix-tree -- or maybe that was for rbtree (?) -- > > but I can't find that just now. > > http://people.redhat.com/jmoyer/radix-tree/ This one just tests that radix_tree_preload() goes deep enough: not affected by the little change I've made. > > And one Andrew Morton has a userspace radix tree test harness at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/rtth.tar.gz This should still be as relevant as it was before, but I notice its radix_tree.c is almost identical to the source currently in the kernel tree, so I ought at the least to keep it in synch. Whether there's anything suitable for testing here in the changes that I've made, I'll have to look into later. Hugh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists