| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:43:58 -0700 From: Peter Hsiang <Peter.Hsiang@...im-ic.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>, Taylor Hutt <thutt@...omium.org> CC: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>, "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: Max98095: Fix logging of hardware revision. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:54:32AM -0700, Taylor Hutt wrote: > > The base hardware revision of the Maxim 98095 part is 0x40; the code > > which outputs the revision of the hardware has been updated to > > properly use uppercase alphabetic values for the revision numbers. > > Are you sure that this is true for all devices that might be supported > by the driver (I'm guessing there may be other variants)? There's > often a drift between silicon and package revisions which gets papered > over by datasheets and ignored by drivers. I checked with hardware engineering and was told 0x40=RevA, 0x41=RevB.. Would a raw value or the use of a 0x3F bit mask be more acceptable? Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists