linux-kernel - Re: Using a new perf tool against an older kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:43:28 -0700
From:	Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using a new perf tool against an older kernel

On 6/23/11 5:11 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

>
> I'm confused, you first said it happens with new tools on older kernel.
>
> Can you tell us which combination of kernel/user raises the error? and
> which error.
>

perf-3.0 + 2.6.38

perf record -agR gives:

Can't find id 9's machine
Found 1 unknown events!

perf-3.0 + 2.6.32

perf record -ag
perf script

samples have bogus timestamps

perf-3.0 + 2.6.32

perf record -agR
perf script

error: Samples do not contain timestamps

perf-3.0 + any kernel

perf record -agT
perf script

is happy everywhere. Thanks!

  -Arun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/