| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:52:19 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>, Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>, Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> Subject: Re: [Bug #38292] slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 00:31 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > > of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.39. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > > know (either way). > > > > who said its a regression? > > I suspect Rafael saw your mail to lkml with a nasty looking lockdep > message in it and assumed it was a new one? > > Instead it's one that always had the chance to trigger? Yeah, its just terribly hard, you need all the various debug options enabled and a lot of luck. There's nothing involved that changed recently afaik. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists