linux-kernel - Re: perf: is PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES a kernel or user event?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:30:57 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: perf: is PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES a kernel or user
 event?

On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> If you consider the strict meaning of exclude_user/exclude_kernel, they exclude
> events that _happen_ in user/kernel space. And context switches happen in kernel
> space.

I can see that it's somewhat arbitrary how context switches are 
classified.

I just want some assurances that now that it's moved to being
a kernel event it stays that way.

As it is, people upgrading from 2.6.32 to 2.6.34 and using the "cs:u"
event will suddently start getting "0" results.  

Possibly perf_events should just ignore exclude_kernel/exclude_user on an 
event like this where there is no real distinction.

Vince
vweaver1@...s.utk.edu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/