lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:47:54 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	Abhishek Kane <v-abkane@...rosoft.com>,
	Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 38/40] Staging: hv: storvsc: Fixup srb_status for INQUIRY
 and MODE_SENSE

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 07:39:35AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> The current handler on the Windows Host does not correctly handle
> INQUIRY and MODE_SENSE commands with some options. Fixup srb_status
> in these cases since the failure is not fatal.

> +	/*
> +	 * The current SCSI handling on the host side does
> +	 * not correctly handle:
> +	 * INQUIRY command with page code parameter set to 0x80
> +	 * MODE_SENSE command with cmd[2] == 0x1c
> +	 *
> +	 * Setup srb status so this won't be fatal.
> +	 */
> +
> +	if ((stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == INQUIRY) ||
> +	   (stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == MODE_SENSE))
> +		vstor_packet->vm_srb.srb_status = 0;

Given that the srb_status is only used for debug printks I don't
quite see the point.  If people explicitly turn on debugging they
should see that these commands fail, shouldn't they?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ