linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 08/18] mfd: twl6040: Add initial support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Jul 2011 13:48:44 +0200
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/18] mfd: twl6040: Add initial support

Hi Peter,

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> +int twl6040_is_powered(struct twl6040 *twl6040)
> +{
> +	return twl6040->power_count;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(twl6040_is_powered);
Do we really need to export this one ?

> +static inline int twl6040_get_rev(struct twl6040 *twl6040)
> +{
> +	return twl6040->rev;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int twl6040_request_irq(struct twl6040 *twl6040, int irq,
> +				      irq_handler_t handler,
> +				      unsigned long irqflags,
> +				      const char *name,
> +				      void *data)
> +{
> +	if (!twl6040->irq_base)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return request_threaded_irq(twl6040->irq_base + irq, NULL, handler,
> +				    irqflags, name, data);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void twl6040_free_irq(struct twl6040 *twl6040, int irq,
> +				    void *data)
> +{
> +	if (!twl6040->irq_base)
> +		return;
> +
> +	free_irq(twl6040->irq_base + irq, data);
> +}
I don't see the value of those 3 inline functions. Removing them would make
the code actually more understandable (especially for the 2nd one).

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/